Kalyani Shankar
With Mamata Banerjee's latest demand, the revival or abolition of Legislative Councils
has become one of political expediency One more flash point has emerged between the Centre and West Bengal with chief minister Mamata Banerjee's cabinet last week deciding to revive the Legislative Council. It was one of her campaign promises. Banerjee had said that eminent people and veteran leaders who were not selected for assembly tickets would be made members of the Vidhan Parishad. In other words, she wants some more leeway for her patronage.
The revival or abolition of legislative councils has become one of political expediency. The
Legislative Council is constituted as per Article 168 of the Indian Constitution. Currently
only six states – Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, and
Karnataka – have Legislative Councils. Kashmir too had one, until the state was bifurcated
into Union Territories of J&K and Ladakh in 2019.
India's transition from unicameral to bicameral legislature started under the Government of
India Act, 1919, which established the Rajya Sabha in 1921. The Simon Commission in 1927, citing complexity and expenditure, was also divided about its feasibility. Then the
Government of India Act of 1935 set up bicameral legislatures in Indian provinces.
The framers of the Constitution felt that in the beginning, the states of Bihar, Bombay,
Madras, Punjab, the United Provinces, and West Bengal would have a Legislative
Council. The Constitution gives limited powers to the Legislative Council. Dr Bidhan Chandra Roy, Bengal's first chief minister after Independence, formed the Vidhan
Parishad in 1952. When the Congress lost power in many states in 1967, the United Front
coalition government in West Bengal got the council abolished in 1969. Punjab followed
suit, abolishing its Legislative Council later that year.
However, having or not having a Legislative Council has now become a political issue. Some
argue that it can accommodate individuals and people of eminence who do not like to contest Assembly polls, exactly as Mamata Banerjee says. They believe that it can act as a watchdog and keep a check on hasty decisions. Those against say that it is a burden on the exchequer and it is normally used to rehabilitate politicians.
The Andhra Pradesh Assembly has passed a resolution seeking to abolish the council in 2020. The council was the first set up in 1958. Then the TDP chief minister N.T. Rama Rao got it abolished in 1985. The Congress chief minister Dr Y.S. Rajashekar Reddy revived it in 2007.
Last year, the Council dominated by the TDP referred three Capital Bills to a Select
Committee, which provoked the current chief minister Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy into taking
measures to abolish the council.
Creating or abolishing a Council has been a contentious issue for the last four decades in
Tamil Nadu.The M.G. Ramachandran government in 1986 abolished the council to block the
entry of the DMK chief M. Karunanidhi. Since then, DMK has made attempts to re-establish
the Council, and AIADMK has opposed such moves. Now that the DMK is back in power
revival of the council is on the cards.
The Congress in Madya Pradesh had passed a resolution in 1967 in the Vidhan Sabha but the resolution did not get the approval of the Centre. In 1993 and 2018 also the party promised a bicameral legislature but could not fulfil its poll promise.
The Odisha Assembly recently passed a resolution for a Legislative Council. Proposals to
create Councils in Rajasthan and Assam are pending in Parliament.
The debate on the relevance of the council continues in political circles. B R Ambedkar
argued in the Constituent Assembly comparing it to the curate's egg-good only in parts. The US, Senatorial saucer is also often cited. The story goes that when the then US President George Washington hosted a breakfast meeting with Thomas Jefferson who was against the senate, Why asked Washington, & did you just now pour that coffee into your saucer, before drinking?
‘To cool it' answered Jefferson My throat is not made of brass. ‘Even so' re-joined
Washington, ‘we pour our legislation into the senatorial saucer to cool it' resting his case.
Councils have also played a constructive role on occasion.
A deep study to find out the role of the council in enhancing the legislature process needs to be taken up. But creation or abolition of Councils should not become a frivolous decision
based on the whims and fancies of the egoistic leaders and political parties. A parliamentary standing committee has suggested framing a national policy but it may not be the best way forward. Given these circumstances, it will be prudent to leave it to the states.
(The author is a senior journalist and political commentator. The views expressed are
personal.)
