Disengagement in eastern Ladakh on China’s Terms: Former defence minister

    Northlines News Desk

    New Delhi, February 14

    Former defence minister AK Antony on Sunday alleged that the terms of disengagement of India-China troops and creation of a buffer zone at Pangong Tso lake and Galwan areas in eastern Ladakh is ‘surrender’ of Indian interests.

     

    He accused the Narendra Modi government of appeasing China, of “agreeing to disengagement at China’s terms”.

     

    Antony, who is a former defence minister, addressed a press conference in New Delhi and said: “Please understand the gravity of the situation. Disengagement is good but it cannot be at cost of national security.”

    He asked the government to tell its plan to restore status-quo ante as April 2020 along the Line of Actual Control (LAC).

    Former defence minister AK Antony addressing the media on the India-China border row at the AICC headquarters in New Delhi on Sunday.

    “The government is not realising the danger of creating such buffer zones,” said Antony, whose words were later translated in Hindi by Randeep Surjewala.

    The Army had occupied Kailash range in south of Pangong Tso but during the negotiations, we agreed to withdraw from there, said Antony, adding: “It could have been a bargaining chip.”

    Speaking on the situation at the north bank of the Pangong Tso, Antony said: “The area between Finger 4 and Finger 8 (fingers are numbers of given to mountain spurs that descend onto the north bank of the Pangong Tso) was a disputed area where both armies used to patrol. Sometimes, there was pushing and jostling by troops of either side but India always maintained that claimed the LAC upto Finger 8.”

    Antony, quoting Defence Minister Rajnath Singh words in Parliament, said: “We have agreed that we will come back to Finger 3.”

     

    “Finger 3 is a permanent base named Dhan Singh Thapa. The Indian Army has a post at Finger 4 then why has that been vacated and why has the right to patrol till Finger 8 been surrendered”, he questioned.

    “Areas which have been traditionally under our control, we are surrendering that right as well,” he said and went on to cite the example of Galwan.

    “It was never a point of dispute in the list of disputes. There are some two dozen hotspots. Galwan was not a dispute even in 1962. It was always a part of India but for the first time, a buffer zone has been created there,” Antony said.

    If our Army controls the Galwan Valley, we can, at any moment, reach the Karokaram Pass (the northern most tip of Ladakh facing Xinjiang in China).