Home Opinions Why Chenab Region needs recognition, not reinvention

    Why Chenab Region needs recognition, not reinvention

    By Sadaket Ali Malik

    Tucked within the rugged mountains of Jammu and Kashmir, the Chenab Region—comprising Doda, Kishtwar, and Ramban—is often viewed through the narrow lens of underdevelopment and “backwardness.” Yet, beneath this perception lies a complex and resilient cultural landscape that does not require reinvention, but recognition.

    For decades, policy discourse has treated regions like the Chenab Region as blank slates—spaces to be modernized, reshaped, and aligned with mainstream development models. In doing so, it has overlooked the deeply rooted systems of knowledge, belief, and social organization that have sustained its people for centuries.

    At the core of the Chenab Region’s identity is a remarkable synthesis of ancient and evolving traditions. Indigenous belief systems, particularly Naga (serpent) worship, continue to shape local cosmology, especially in areas like Bhaderwah. Sacred sites dedicated to Nag Devtas, often located near water sources and forests, reflect an ecological consciousness that predates modern environmental discourse.

    Layered upon this is a strong Sufi tradition, shaped by saints such as Shah Farid-ud-Din, whose teachings emphasized inclusivity, humility, and spiritual unity. Shrines across the region serve not only as religious centers but also as spaces of social cohesion, where communities gather irrespective of religious boundaries. The celebration of Urs, with its music, shared meals, and collective devotion, mirrors older community festivals, revealing a deep continuity rather than rupture.

    These traditions are not isolated rituals; they are embedded within everyday life. Practices of puja coexist with Sufi customs, and sacred geographies often overlap. This syncretic culture challenges rigid religious identities and offers a model of coexistence that is increasingly rare.

    Economically, the region follows a subsistence-based system that is both practical and sustainable. Agriculture on terraced slopes, livestock rearing, and seasonal pastoralism—similar to the migratory patterns of Bakarwals—allow communities to adapt to harsh climatic conditions. Forest resources such as guchhi (morel mushrooms) and chilgoza supplement livelihoods, demonstrating a balanced relationship with nature.

    Equally significant is the social fabric. Systems like Landa, where communities share labor without monetary exchange, foster cooperation and mutual dependence. In a world increasingly defined by individualism, such practices highlight the enduring value of collective living.

    Yet, despite this cultural richness, the Chenab Region faces undeniable challenges. Poor infrastructure, limited healthcare, low literacy rates, and seasonal isolation have restricted opportunities for growth. These issues are real and demand urgent attention. However, addressing them does not require dismantling the region’s cultural foundations.

    The problem lies in the approach. Development strategies often aim to replace traditional systems rather than strengthen them. This risks eroding the very identity that makes the Chenab Region unique. What is needed instead is a model of development that is rooted in recognition—recognition of indigenous knowledge, linguistic diversity, cultural practices, and ecological wisdom.

    Recognition also means representation. The voices of Pahari communities—Bhalesi, Bhaderwahi, Sarazi, Pogali, Khashali, Dachni, Marwi, Bonjwali, and Kishtwari—must be included in decision-making processes that shape their future. Policies must be informed not just by statistics, but by lived realities.

    In an era of climate uncertainty and cultural homogenization, the Chenab Region offers valuable lessons. Its so-called “primitive traits” are, in truth, sophisticated systems of sustainability, resilience, and coexistence. Reinventing them would mean losing a heritage that has much to teach the modern world.

    The path forward is clear: do not reinvent the Chenab Region—recognize it, respect it, and build upon its strengths.