back to top
IndiaSC stays BCI resolution on verification drive of AoRs

SC stays BCI resolution on verification drive of AoRs

Date:

NEW DELHI:  The Supreme Court today stayed a resolution issued by Bar Council of (BCI) that had made it mandatory for Advocates-on-Record (AoRs) to undergo its ongoing verification drive to check professional credentials of practicing lawyers.

BCI, the apex bar body, has undertaken a verification drive to weed out law practitioners with fake law degrees and done away with the earlier clause that had granted exemption to AoRs from filling up a verification form under the BCI's Certificate of Practice Rules, 2015.

AoRs are those lawyers who clear qualifying examination conducted by the apex court and are entitled to appear and sign petitions and documents in the top court.

 

They were opposing the BCI resolution on the grounds including that they have become AoRs with the nod of the apex court and their details were there on the Supreme Court site.

“No effect should be given to the (BCI) resolution. Let the matter be heard on June 30,” a vacation bench comprising Justices P C Ghose and Amitava Roy said and allowed the Supreme Court Advocate-on-Record Association (SCAORA) to be a party to the ongoing lis (suit) on the issue.

At the outset, the bench asked A K Prasad, representing the BCI, as to how the bar body was empowered to amend the rules framed under the law by passing a resolution.

“The question is, can you (BCI) amend the rules by way of a resolution,” it said. However, the court then left it to be decided by the bench concerned after the summer vacation.

The BCI's ongoing verification drive is under challenge before various high courts in the country.

The SCAORA had yesterday moved the apex court seeking urgent hearing of its plea that its members should not be subjected to the BCI verification drive as their records were already with the court.

The SCAORA had told the bench that BCI had a practice not to subject designated senior advocates and Advocates-on- Records (AoRs) to verification.

The lawyers' body had said that designated senior advocates and AORs were earlier exempted from the verification process but the BCI had last year amended rules and brought AORs in the bracket of common lawyers.

The BCI had last year amended the rules for verification process to filter out fake advocates among over 15 lakh practising lawyers in the country.

 

Northlines
Northlines
The Northlines is an independent source on the Web for news, facts and figures relating to Jammu, Kashmir and Ladakh and its neighbourhood.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Popular

More like this
Related

Jammu witness heavy rainfall; elderly woman dies

Normal life affected; Fresh snowfall in higher reaches, Sgr-Jmu...

Heavy rains keep people away from polling booths

Amir Tantray Kathua/Udhampur/Doda, Apr 19: The erratic weather conditions with intermittent...

2 labourers die after falling into trench in Kulgam

Srinagar, Apr 19: At least two labourers died and...

LG Sinha calls for an approach towards skill development

Jammu Tawi, Apr 19: Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha on...