Both central and state government employees are firm in opposing the scheme
BY C. SRIKUMAR
Agitation of the central government and state government Employees are going on throughout the country against the no-guarantee National Pension System (NPS)
implemented by the BJP-led NDA government during the year 2003. The central government and state government employees are grateful to the Communist Party of India
for adopting a resolution against the NPS and demanding restoration of defined, guaranteed and non-contributory old pension scheme in the 24th Congress of the CPI held at
Vijayawada from October14 to 18, 2022.
Recently, during the month of September, more than 3,000 defence civilian employees assembled at Jantar Mantar, New Delhi, and staged an anti-NPS dharna
and submitted a memorandum to the government demanding for scrapping the NPS and restoring the old pension scheme. In Kerala the AITUC led state
government employees' organizations led a strong 25,000 employees' ‘March to Secretariat' demanding withdrawal of NPS and for bringing back the old pension
scheme for the state government employees.
The BJP government in 2003 under the pressure and dictates of the World Bank and IMF implemented the contributory NPS with lot of fanfare propagating that the
employees would get a huge amount as pension, since the pension contribution of both the employees and the government would be invested in the stock market. Today
after 18years of the implementation of the NPS, the government stands totally exposed. Employees who are retiring after 18 years of service in the NPS is getting a very paltry
monthly pension of Rs 2,000 to Rs 4,000 depending upon the value of annuity which they are purchasing from the 40 per cent of the pension fund available in their account. In
the old pension scheme the minimum pension itself is Rs 9,000 and every year to compensate the price rise two instalments of dearness relief are being paid to the
pensioners. Under the NPS the pension remains static and no provision for compensation of price rise.
The NPS is nothing but a gambling or a lottery. If there is a crash in the stock market, the burden of getting less amount of pension should be shouldered by the
poor pensioner. From various global studies it is revealed that most of the private pension funds were wiped away in the deep economic crisis. The argument put
forth by the Vajpayee government in 2003 was that more than 25 per cent of the country's budget is eaten away by the pensioners. But the fact remains that the
government gets back a major portion of the pension, either as income tax or through GST which is collected from the pensioners on whatever he or she is
purchasing from the market.
Under the Pension's Act 1871 enacted during the British regime, pension is a bounty, given as a matter of grace depending upon the sweet will of the employer.
In the year 1971 the Supreme Court has ruled that pension is not a bounty payable on the sweet will and pleasure of the government and that, on the other hand,
the right to pension is a valuable right vesting in a government servant. The Supreme Court further held that pension is a property. In another historical judgment
delivered on December 17, 1981 by the five member bench of the Supreme Court of India consisting of Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud, Justice VD Tulzapurkar,
Justice DA Desai, Justice O Chinnappa Reddy and Justice Baharul Islam declared that pension is neither a bounty nor a matter of grace depending upon the sweet
will of the employer and that it creates a vested right subject to 1972 Rules which are statutory in character, because they are enacted in exercise of powers
conferred by the Proviso to Article 309and Clause (5) of Article 148 of the Constitution; that Pension is not an ex-gratia payment, but it is a payment for the past
service rendered; and it is a social welfare measure rendering socio-economic justice to those who in the heyday of their life ceaselessly toiled for the employer on
an assurance that in their old age, they would not be left in the lurch.
Despite the above historical judgment the government employees have to fight for their old age security in this country.
In the old pension scheme the employee is not required to contribute anything for getting pension after retirement. An employee who has put in a minimum 10
years of qualifying service is eligible for 50 percent of last pay drawn as monthly pension subject to a minimum of Rs 9,000 per month. As already mentioned two
instalments of dearness relief is also paid on the pension to compensate the price rise. Forty per cent of the pension can be commuted in advance which will be
restored back after 15 years. At present the central government employees have demanded to the government that the commuted pension should be restored back
after 12 years.
Incidentally the Gujarat government keeping the state assembly elections in mind has reduced the restoration of commuted pension after 13 years instead of 15
years. Apart from this in the old pension scheme, pension increases by 20 per cent from 80 years to less than 85 years, 30 per cent from 85 years to less than 90
years, 40 per cent from 90 years to less than 95 years, 50 per cent from 95 years to less than 100 years and 100 per cent of the basic pension from 100 years or
more. At present the Parliamentary Standing Committee has recommended that pension should be increased by one per cent every year that is five percent after 65
years and soon.
The ILO Convention No 102 that is Social Security (Minimum Standards) Convention 1952 has laid down nine principal branches of social security, namely
medical care, sickness, unemployment, old age, employment injury, family, maternity, invalidity and survivors' benefit.
ILO Convention No102 ensures periodical payments, corresponding to at least 40 per cent of the reference wage, ILO Convention No 128 ensures periodical
payments corresponding to at least 45 per cent of the reference wage and ILO Convention No 121 ensures periodical payments corresponding to at least 50 per
cent of the reference wage. This 50 per cent is ensured in the old pension scheme, whereas in the NPS there is no such guarantee of any minimum pension.
When the NPS was introduced in 2003 by the BJP government, the Left Front governments' of West Bengal, Kerala and Tripura refused to implement the NPS
and continued with the Old Pension Scheme. Subsequently, after changes of governments, Kerala and Tripura have introduced the NPS and West Bengal is
continuing with Old Pension Scheme. Considering the forthcoming elections and the ill effects of the NPS, the state governments of Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh,
Jharkhand and Punjab have already withdrawn the NPS and have restored the old pension scheme for their employees.
It is now the right time for the central government employees and the state government employees to relentlessly fight against the NPS so as to make it a major
issue for the 2024 general elections. The government employees and their families should decide that they will vote only for those political parties which are
opposed to NPS and which are assuring that they will restore the old pension scheme if they come to power.
(IPA Service)
