back to top
India'Give CJI fixed tenure !

‘Give CJI fixed tenure !

Date:

‘Give CJI fixed tenure !

New Delhi, Dec 8 (PTI) As the government and the judiciary exchange barbs over rising vacancies in courts, a Parliamentary committee today recommended increasing the retirement age of Supreme Court judges and fixing a “minimum tenure” for the Chief Justice of and chief justices of high courts to ease shortage.

In its report tabled today, the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Law and Personnel was critical of the government and the judiciary for not sticking to timelines to fill up vacancies in high courts.

Seeking to make the present system of appointment of judges more transparent, the committee said the SC Collegium should inform the candidates whose name it has rejected on a particular ground.

It said the government also rejects the recommendations of the collegium “without furnishing cogent reasons…such practices are against the principles of natural justice and leads to opaqueness in the appointment process”.

On the issue of hiking the retirement age of SC judges from the present 65 to 67 years, it said the retirement age has remained unchanged since India became a Republic. The retirement age of high court judges was increased fro 60 to 62 in 1963.

Referring to the short tenures the CJI and chief justices of high courts often have, the panel said in the last 20 years, 17 Chief Justices of India have been appointed and out of those, only three had tenure of more than two years.

“Many of them had tenure of even less than one year,” it observed.

It said chief justice of high courts in most cases get appointed for a less than two years term. Some of the chief justices also get elevated to the bench of Supreme Court, further shortening their tenure in high courts. “In many cases, the post of Chief Justice are not filled- up simultaneously and acting Chief Justice, appointed as a stop-gap arrangement, does not often take decision about names to be recommended to the Union Government/Supreme Court collegium for filling-up of vacancies in that High Court,” the panel said taking a grim view.

It said that ensuring a minimum tenure may resolve the issue and asked the Law Ministry “to consider ways so that a Chief Justice in the High Courts and in the Supreme Court remains in position for a certain minimum tenure”.

It also said that instead of five, a minimum of 11 judges of the Supreme Court should hear cases involving the validity of a Constitutional amendment.

It also recommended the cases involving the interpretation of Constitution should not be heard by a Bench of less than 7 judges.

Northlines
Northlines
The Northlines is an independent source on the Web for news, facts and figures relating to Jammu, Kashmir and Ladakh and its neighbourhood.

Share post:

Popular

More like this
Related

Intention Of Centre To Levy GST On Petrol, Diesel; States Will Have To Decide On Rate: FM

NEW DELHI, June 22: Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on...

Council Mulls Rate Changes as Economy Shows Signs of Recovery

The Goods and Services Tax or GST Council held...

DU PG Admissions 2024: 22nd June marks the start of admissions, check schedule and key details here

The first round seat allocation results for Delhi University...

UAPA Tribunal Upholds Ban on Tehreek-E-Hurriyat, Muslim League!

NEW DELHI, June 22: A tribunal set up under...