New Delhi, Oct 31: The Supreme Court on Friday refused to exempt the chief secretaries of states and Union Territories from appearing physically before it on November 3 in the stray dogs case, observing that there was “no respect” for its earlier orders.
A bench comprising Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta expressed strong displeasure over the failure of most states and UTs to file compliance affidavits on the implementation of Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules, despite the court’s directive on August 22.
The court noted that as of October 27, only West Bengal, Telangana, and the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) had submitted their affidavits. “It is very unfortunate that the court is wasting time dealing with issues that should have been handled by municipal bodies and state governments,” Justice Nath remarked.
Rejecting Solicitor General Tushar Mehta’s plea for allowing virtual attendance, the bench said, “No, they will have to come physically. There is no respect for the order of the court. Then alright, let them come. We will deal with them.”
The apex court had earlier ordered all chief secretaries—except those of West Bengal and Telangana—to appear in person to explain the delay in filing compliance reports. It had expanded the case’s scope in August to include all states and UTs, directing municipal authorities to provide complete data on dog pounds, veterinarians, dog-catchers, and facilities available for enforcing ABC Rules.
The suo motu case, initiated on July 28, followed reports of rising stray dog attacks and rabies deaths, especially among children in the national capital.
Earlier this week, the court also declined Bihar’s request to exempt its chief secretary due to the ongoing assembly elections, saying, “There is the Election Commission to take care. Don’t worry. Let the chief secretary come.” Elections in Bihar are scheduled for November 6 and 11, with counting on November 14. (Agencies)
